What is Force Majeure Clause in Contracts? Using AI for Effective Response

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Sunset through a bank of framed office windows.

If a service agreement does not include a force majeure clause, the affected party cannot automatically claim relief for non-performance. Instead, the dispute may fall back on general contract law principles (such as frustration of contract in common law) — which are harder to prove and may not excuse liability as clearly as a contractual clause would.

A force majeure clause is a contractual provision that excuses performance when certain unforeseen events occur. Frustration of contract, on the other hand, is a common-law principle applied by courts when the contract’s central purpose is destroyed, even if there’s no specific clause in the agreement.

Generally, no. Force majeure protections exist only if written into the contract. Without a clause, courts or arbitral tribunals may apply local legal doctrines, but these vary widely and rarely provide the same clarity or protection as a properly drafted clause.

It depends on the contract wording. Some contracts explicitly include epidemics, pandemics, or government-imposed shutdowns as qualifying events, while others do not. If these terms are absent, parties may need to rely on other legal doctrines instead.

You must follow the procedure laid out in your agreement, which usually involves giving timely notice in a prescribed format and providing evidence that the event qualifies as force majeure under the clause.

A force majeure cancellation clause allows a party to terminate the contract altogether if the disruptive event continues for an extended period (e.g., 60 or 90 days). It is applied when suspension or delay no longer makes sense because the purpose of the contract has been permanently affected.

Yes. AI can rapidly scan a portfolio of contracts, identify which agreements contain force majeure clauses, extract key terms, and even draft initial notice templates. This reduces manual effort and speeds up response.

 Courts typically interpret force majeure clauses narrowly, focusing on the exact wording of the clause and whether the event was truly unforeseeable and beyond control. For example, some rulings during COVID-19 excused performance only where the contract explicitly mentioned “pandemic” or “government shutdowns,” while others denied claims based on general “acts of God” language.