Contract Lifecycle Management Process: 7 Stages and 5 Steps

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Navigating Its 7 Stages and 5 Key Steps for Business Excellence

Contract management is typically divided into two broad phases: pre-signature and post-signature.

  • Pre-signature phase covers all activities leading up to signing, including contract request, drafting, negotiation, collaboration, and approvals. The focus is on efficiency, accuracy, and risk mitigation to ensure the contract is finalized quickly and correctly.
  • Post-signature phase begins after execution and involves obligation tracking, compliance monitoring, performance management, renewals, and amendments. This phase ensures the business realizes the intended value of the contract while staying compliant and reducing risk.

Together, these phases form the backbone of effective contract lifecycle management (CLM), driving both speed before signature and value after signature.

Many companies handle contracts in silos across legal, sales, and procurement, without a unified framework. This leads to inconsistent practices, duplicate effort, and unclear ownership at different points in the contract lifecycle.

Start by identifying all touchpoints where contracts interact with your business — from request intake to renewal. Then assign ownership at each stage, define approval workflows, and document compliance checkpoints. A process map helps reveal bottlenecks and areas where automation can bring consistency.

The process is cross-functional by design. Legal ensures compliance, procurement manages supplier obligations, sales drives customer agreements, and finance verifies financial terms. Successful CLM depends on building a process that balances these perspectives while maintaining accountability.

Yes. While the overall lifecycle framework stays the same, processes differ by contract type. For example, NDAs may move quickly with minimal approvals, while MSA or outsourcing agreements follow more rigorous, multi-layered review steps.

A well-designed process can fail if teams don’t adopt it. Training, clear role definitions, and executive sponsorship are critical to ensure teams follow the process consistently. Without strong change management, old habits (like managing contracts over email) often resurface.

The greatest risk is fragmentation — when parts of the lifecycle are handled in different systems or manually tracked outside the process. This creates blind spots in compliance and renewals, and makes it harder to enforce accountability.

The contract lifecycle process should be reviewed at least annually, or sooner if there are major regulatory changes, business expansions, or technology upgrades. Regular reviews ensure the process remains aligned with evolving business needs.

Organizations with ad-hoc, inconsistent processes see limited returns from CLM tools. As process maturity grows — with standardized workflows, automation, and analytics — the ROI increases significantly, turning contracts into strategic assets.