Your Ultimate Guide to Contract Templates: Create Agreements Faster and Smarter

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Contract Template Header Banner

Typically, ownership sits with the legal or contract management team, but successful organizations treat it as a cross-functional responsibility. Legal ensures compliance, procurement or sales provide input based on operational needs, and contract ops teams manage version control and user access.

A best practice is to review templates quarterly or whenever there’s a regulatory change, new risk exposure, or feedback from internal teams or counterparties. Stale templates can lead to compliance gaps or negotiation bottlenecks.

Outdated templates may contain superseded legal language, miss recent regulatory updates, or lack important risk provisions. This can expose your company to legal liability, compliance violations, or commercial disputes.

Without a centralized CLM platform, version control is notoriously difficult. Teams may download and reuse outdated Word or PDF files. A CLM platform like Sirion prevents this by enforcing a single source of truth and dynamically updating templates based on approved playbooks.

Yes — if the templates are well-governed. With pre-approved language, locked clauses, and embedded business rules (like those in Sirion’s playbooks), non-legal users can safely self-serve common contracts without legal review on every draft.

Keep the templates accessible through a user-friendly platform, provide light training, and make sure they include business-relevant guidance (e.g., when to use vs. escalate). Embedding help text, clause explanations, or fallback logic helps drive consistent usage.

A template is a full contract framework for a specific agreement type. A clause library is a modular collection of pre-approved clauses (e.g., for indemnity, liability, payment terms) that can be inserted based on context. The best systems combine both — using clause libraries to populate dynamic templates based on rules.