Dealing with a Material Breach of Contract: Steps, Remedies, and Prevention

Subscribe to our Newsletter

The first scenario is a problem; the second is a catastrophe. Both are technically a breach of contract, but they don’t carry the same weight. This crucial difference is what separates a minor issue from a “material breach,” a concept that can determine the fate of a contract and have significant financial consequences. But how do you know when a breach crosses the line from a simple misstep to a contract-killing failure? It’s less about the specific mistake and more about its impact on the agreement’s core purpose.

What is a Material Breach of Contract?

A material breach of contract is not just any slip-up—it’s a failure so serious that it undermines the very purpose of the agreement. Unlike a minor breach, which affects side terms or details, a material breach strikes at the core promises that motivated the contract in the first place.

In practical terms, a material breach occurs when:

The non-breaching party is deprived of the central benefit they expected.
The breach goes beyond inconvenience and renders the agreement ineffective.
The failure is so significant that the wronged party has the right to terminate the contract and pursue damages.

Think of it as the line where an error stops being “fixable” within the contract and instead destroys the foundation of the deal. That’s why material breaches often lead to contract termination, legal disputes, and financial consequences.

To see the broader context, explore our guide on the common reasons for termination of contract.

Breach of Contract vs. Material Breach vs. Minor Breach

When people hear “breach of contract,” they often assume it means the deal is over. In reality, breach of contract is the umbrella term for any failure to live up to a contractual promise. Within this category, the law distinguishes between two main types: minor breaches and material breaches.

A Material Breach is a failure so significant that it strikes at the very heart of the contract. It defeats the purpose of the contract and deprives the injured party of the fundamental benefit they bargained for. This is like ordering a car and receiving a bicycle. The failure is so complete that it justifies terminating the contract and seeking damages.
A Minor Breach (or Partial Breach) is a failure to meet a less critical term of the contract. The overall purpose of the agreement can still be fulfilled, even with the error. Think of it as a scratch on a new car—it’s not what you wanted, but you still have a functioning vehicle. The contract continues, and the wronged party can typically sue for damages caused by the minor failure.

The core question is always: Did the breach undermine the fundamental reason the contract was signed? If the answer is yes, you are likely dealing with a material breach.

How Can You Tell if a Breach Is Actually Material?

Deciding whether a breach is material isn’t always black and white; it’s a judgment call based on the circumstances. Courts don’t rely on guesswork. Instead, they use a set of established factors to analyze the situation. You can use these same factors as a checklist to assess a potential breach and understand its severity.

Before you jump to conclusions, walk through these key questions to determine if a failure truly defeats the purpose of your contract.

How much was the injured party deprived of the benefit they expected? This is the most important factor. If you contracted for a fully functional website and got one that crashes every five minutes, you’ve been deprived of the core benefit. But if the website works perfectly but has a typo on the “About Us” page, the deprivation is minimal.
Can the injured party be adequately compensated for the damage? If a simple payment can make the wronged party whole, the breach is less likely to be material. For instance, if a supplier delivers goods a day late and you lose $500 in sales, they can compensate you for that amount. But if their failure causes you to lose a multi-million dollar client, money may not be an adequate fix.
Is the breaching party likely to fix (or “cure”) the failure? The court considers whether the party at fault is willing and able to correct their mistake. A company that immediately acknowledges an error and presents a concrete plan to fix it is viewed differently than one that denies the problem or goes silent.
What hardship would the breaching party face if the contract is terminated? Terminating a contract can have severe consequences, such as forfeiture of payments or materials. Courts weigh the hardship on the breaching party against the harm done to the non-breaching party. If a minor error could cause the breaching party to lose everything, a court might be hesitant to call it a material breach.
Was the breach a result of bad faith or willful misconduct? An honest mistake is viewed differently than an intentional act of deceit. If a contractor knowingly used substandard materials to cut costs, that points toward a material breach. If they used the wrong materials due to a genuine supplier mix-up, it might be seen as a minor breach, provided they can fix it.

Examples of Material Breaches vs. Minor Breaches: Real-World Industry Cases

The best way to understand this concept is to see how it applies in the real world. The same principles work across different sectors, but the specifics can look very different.

Here is a breakdown of what could constitute a material versus a minor breach in four common business scenarios.

Industry	Material Breach of Contract Examples	Minor Breach of Contract Examples
Construction	A contractor builds a foundation that doesn’t meet mandatory safety codes, rendering the structure unsafe and unusable. This defeats the core purpose of building a safe building.	The contractor uses a paint color that is a slightly different shade than specified in the contract, but is of equal quality. The building is still safe and functional.
Software (SaaS)	A software provider fails to deliver the core security and data encryption features promised in a Service Level Agreement (SLA), exposing the client to significant data-breach risks.	The software has a minor bug in a non-essential reporting feature that will be fixed in the next scheduled patch. The core functionality remains unaffected.
Manufacturing	A parts supplier delivers a batch of engine components that are out of specification and fail quality control, making them impossible to use in the final product.	The supplier delivers the correct parts but is one day late on a shipment that was not time-sensitive, causing a minor adjustment to the production schedule.
Professional Services	A marketing agency hired to launch a major product campaign fails to secure any of the agreed-upon media placements, resulting in a completely failed launch.	The agency secures all major media placements but makes a typographical error in one of several social media posts, which is quickly corrected.
Healthcare	A vendor supplies defective medical devices that cannot be safely used, undermining patient care and regulatory compliance.	Delivery of non-essential medical supplies is delayed by a few days without disrupting critical services.
Telecommunications	A provider fails to deliver agreed network uptime in an SLA, causing significant business outages for the client.	A brief service slowdown occurs, but overall uptime targets for the month are still met.

Business outcomes are only part of the picture. When disputes escalate, the legal system steps in — and the consequences of a material breach can reshape the entire contract relationship.

For a deeper look at building stronger partnerships beyond disputes, explore our guide on Contract Relationship Management.

So, What Happens After a Material Breach?

Identifying a material breach isn’t just an academic exercise—it unlocks a specific set of powerful remedies for the non-breaching party. The consequences are fundamentally different from those of a minor breach.

When a material breach occurs, the contract is essentially broken. This gives the injured party two primary options:

Terminate the Contract and Sue for Damages: The non-breaching party is excused from their own obligations and can end the agreement. This is known as a discharge of contract. They can then sue for total damages, which aims to put them in the position they would have been in if the contract had been fulfilled.
Continue the Contract and Sue for Damages: Sometimes, it may not be practical to terminate the agreement. The non-breaching party can choose to keep the contract in force and sue for the damages caused specifically by the material breach.

In contrast, after a minor breach, the non-breaching party cannot terminate the contract. The agreement remains in effect, and they must continue to perform their own duties. Their only remedy is to sue for the actual monetary damages caused by the minor failure.

Understanding these different outcomes is critical. Mistakenly treating a minor breach as a material one and terminating the contract can backfire—you could end up being the one in breach. This is why a careful analysis using the factors mentioned above is so important before taking any drastic action. The presence of a clear termination clause can also provide a pre-defined roadmap for how to proceed.

These real-world scenarios show how the same principles play out across sectors. But beyond business consequences, material breaches carry legal weight—and knowing the legal implications helps you avoid costly missteps.

Legal Consequences of a Material Breach of Contract

When a breach is deemed material, the law gives the non-breaching party stronger remedies than it would for a minor misstep. Courts generally allow:

Termination of the Contract: The non-breaching party may be excused from further obligations, treating the agreement as void.
Damages for Losses: Monetary compensation may be awarded to cover direct and consequential losses, often larger than what would apply for a minor breach.
Enforcement of Termination Clauses: If the contract clearly defines what counts as a material breach, courts often uphold those terms as binding.

At the same time, wrongly labeling a minor breach as material and terminating prematurely can expose you to liability. That’s why careful analysis—and legal guidance—are critical before acting.

Want sharper insights before making high-stakes decisions? Explore how AI Powered Contract Analysis helps identify risks and breaches with precision.

What to Do When You Suspect a Material Breach

If you believe the other party has committed a material breach, it’s crucial to proceed thoughtfully to protect your interests. Acting rashly can weaken your position.

Here are the practical next steps to consider:

Review the Contract: First, go back to the agreement. Does it define what constitutes a material breach of contract? Does it outline a specific procedure for giving notice or an opportunity to cure the defect? Follow the steps laid out in your contract to the letter.
Document Everything: Collect all evidence related to the breach. This includes emails, reports, photographs, meeting notes, and any other communication. Create a clear timeline of events. Strong documentation is your best asset in any contract dispute.
Notify the Other Party in Writing: Formally notify the other party of the breach. Your notice should be clear, concise, and professional. It should state the specific contractual obligation that was violated and reference the evidence you have collected. This creates a formal record and may prompt the other party to resolve the issue.
Consult with Legal Counsel: Before you take any steps to terminate the contract or initiate legal action, it is almost always wise to consult an attorney. The nuances of contract law can be complex, and a legal expert can help you assess the situation, understand your rights, and choose the best course of action.

Taking action after a breach is important, but the best strategy is prevention. With the right precautions, many disputes can be avoided altogether.

How to Prevent a Material Breach of Contract

While not all risks can be eliminated, proactive measures greatly reduce the likelihood of disputes escalating into material breaches:

Define Material Breach Clearly: Spell out in the contract what constitutes a material breach of contract, using precise language.
Include Cure Periods: Add clauses that require giving the other party notice and time to fix issues before termination.
Use Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Mediation or arbitration clauses can resolve problems before they reach litigation.
Regular Performance Reviews: Schedule checkpoints and audits to ensure obligations are being met.
Leverage Contract Management Tools: Digital platforms can track obligations, deadlines, and SLAs, making breaches easier to prevent or detect early.

6 Remedies for Material Breach of Contract

When a material breach of contract occurs, the non-breaching party has powerful legal remedies designed to restore balance and protect their interests. The right remedy often depends on the severity of the breach, the nature of the contract, and the damages suffered. Common remedies include:

Termination of the Contract: If the breach undermines the agreement’s core purpose, you may be entitled to end the contract entirely without further obligations.
Compensatory Damages: Courts may award financial compensation to cover the actual losses caused by the breach, such as lost profits, replacement costs, or additional expenses incurred.
Consequential Damages: In cases where the breach leads to broader ripple effects (for example, reputational harm or lost business opportunities), you may recover damages that were reasonably foreseeable at the time of contracting.
Specific Performance: For unique subject matter (such as real estate or intellectual property), the court may order the breaching party to fulfill their exact contractual obligations instead of paying damages.
Restitution: The injured party may seek to be returned to the position they were in before the contract, requiring the breaching party to refund payments or return property.
Rescission and Reformation: In certain cases, the contract may be rescinded (canceled) or reformed (modified) to better reflect the original intent of the parties, especially if ambiguity contributed to the breach.

Choosing the right remedy is a strategic decision—one best made with legal guidance to ensure it matches both the business goals and the evidence you have gathered.

The Final Word

Not every broken promise in a contract spells disaster. The real test is whether the failure strikes at the agreement’s core purpose. A typo on a website may frustrate you, but a failed checkout system threatens the entire deal. That’s the difference between a minor breach and a material one.

By learning how to spot this line, understanding the legal remedies available, and putting preventive measures in place, you’ll protect your organization from costly disputes. A well-drafted contract, paired with strong oversight, ensures that when obligations aren’t met, you know exactly whether it’s a hiccup—or a deal-breaker.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

How do you prove a material breach of contract?

Proving a material breach relies heavily on documentation. You need to provide clear evidence showing how the other party failed to perform a core contractual obligation and how that failure deprived you of the essential benefit of the agreement. Key evidence often includes the contract itself, written correspondence (emails, letters), progress reports, photographs, third-party expert assessments, and financial records showing losses. The goal is to create a detailed timeline that demonstrates the severity of the failure.

Can a series of minor breaches add up to a material breach?

Yes, this is known as the "cumulative effect" doctrine. While a single late delivery or one minor defect might not be material on its own, a consistent pattern of poor performance can become a material breach. For example, if a supplier is late with every delivery over a six-month period, the cumulative impact on your operations could be severe enough to defeat the purpose of the contract, even if each individual delay was minor.

What is the difference between a material breach and an anticipatory repudiation?

A material breach occurs when a failure to perform has already happened. In contrast, an anticipatory repudiation (or anticipatory breach) happens before the performance is due. It occurs when one party makes a clear and unequivocal statement or action indicating they will not or cannot perform their contractual duties. For instance, if a supplier informs you two weeks before a scheduled delivery that they have sold their entire inventory to someone else, that is an anticipatory repudiation.

Do I have to give the other party a chance to fix the breach?

This often depends on the terms of the contract and the nature of the breach. Many contracts include a "cure period" clause, which requires the non-breaching party to give formal notice and a reasonable amount of time for the other party to remedy the failure. Even if not explicitly stated, providing an opportunity to cure is often seen as acting in good faith and can strengthen your legal position if you later need to terminate the contract. However, some breaches are so severe (like fraud or illegal acts) that they are not curable.

What are common examples of a material breach of contract?

Material breaches typically occur when a party fails to deliver the core benefit that the contract was designed to provide. Examples include:

A supplier delivering defective goods that cannot be used.
A contractor failing to meet mandatory safety codes in construction.
A software vendor omitting critical security features promised in the SLA.
A marketing agency failing to execute the main deliverables of a product launch.

In each case, the breach strikes at the heart of the agreement and prevents the non-breaching party from receiving the fundamental value they bargained for.

Is late payment always a material breach?

Not necessarily. A late payment is often treated as a minor breach, especially if the delay is short and the overall contract remains intact. However, repeated late payments or a failure to pay significant amounts on time can escalate into a material breach if it undermines the financial basis of the agreement. Contracts can also explicitly state whether late payment qualifies as material, making it essential to review the payment terms closely.

Can parties define material breach in the contract itself?

Yes. Many contracts include a clause that spells out what constitutes a material breach. Doing so provides clarity and reduces ambiguity if disputes arise. For example, a service agreement might state that failure to meet uptime requirements for three consecutive months will be considered a material breach. Clearly defining these thresholds in the contract helps both parties manage expectations and reduces the risk of litigation over gray areas.

Additional Resources

Contract Management