Understanding the Types of Mistakes in Contract Law: What Beginners Need to Know

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Imagine you sign an agreement to buy a piece of software, confident it includes certain features essential to your business. After the deal closes, you discover those features were never part of the deal. Could this be a mistake in the contract? Could the agreement be undone or corrected? Mistakes in contract law happen more often than you think, and understanding their types can save parties from costly disputes and confusion.

Contracts form the backbone of business and personal transactions worldwide. Still, errors during formation or understanding can affect the contract’s validity and enforceability. Whether you work in real estate, technology, construction, or retail, grasping the different types of mistakes in contract law helps you recognize risks early and draft agreements that protect your interests.

This article introduces the fundamental types of mistake in contract law, explains how they differ, and outlines practical implications for contracts in any industry.

What Are Considered as Mistakes in Contract Law?

In contract law, a mistake occurs when one or both parties hold an incorrect belief about a fact or law relevant to the contract. This misunderstanding can affect the parties’ consent, which is essential for a valid contract.

Mistakes can cause parties to enter into agreements they would not have agreed to if they had correct information. As a result, some mistaken contracts may be set aside (rescinded), corrected (rectified), or proceed with limitations depending on the mistake’s type and impact.

It is important to distinguish a mistake from misrepresentation—the latter involves false statements deliberately or negligently made by one party to induce another into a contract. Mistake is about erroneous beliefs, whereas misrepresentation involves an external cause of error.

To understand when a contract becomes enforceable, explore the role of Consideration in Contract Law and how value exchange shapes legal validity.

The Four Key Types of Mistakes in Contract Law

Mistakes generally fall into four main categories. Each type affects contracts differently regarding validity and available remedies.

1. Mutual Mistake

A mutual mistake happens when both parties share the same incorrect belief about a fundamental fact or assumption underlying the contract. Neither realizes the error at the time of agreement.

For example, imagine a construction company and a client both believe a plot of land is zoned for commercial use when it is not. Because both act under the same mistaken assumption, the contract may be voidable because they never truly reached a “meeting of the minds.”

2. Unilateral Mistake

A unilateral mistake takes place when only one party is mistaken about a fact or term, while the other either knows the truth or is also mistaken differently. Courts tend to be stricter with unilateral mistakes but may void a contract if the non-mistaken party knew of the error or took advantage of it.

For instance, if a software vendor mistakenly quotes the wrong license price due to a clerical error, and the buyer exploits this, the contract might be voidable.

3. Common Mistake

A common mistake refers to both parties making the same fundamental mistake, but concerning an underlying fact that does not actually exist. Unlike mutual mistake, which depends on shared incorrect assumptions, common mistake pertains to a non-existent or impossible subject matter.

A classic real estate example is when both buyer and seller believe a house exists on a piece of land, but the house was destroyed without their knowledge before the sale. Since the subject no longer exists, the contract can be void.

4. Clerical or Typographical Mistake

Sometimes, documents contain clerical or typographical mistakes, such as miswritten dates, numbers, or names that do not reflect the parties’ original intentions. These are usually easier to correct through legal remedies like rectification, where the court orders the contract text to be amended to match the parties’ agreed terms.

Mistake of Fact vs. Mistake of Law: Why It Matters

Another important distinction is between mistake of fact and mistake of law.

A mistake of fact involves errors about the reality—such as the existence, quality, or ownership of the subject matter.
A mistake of law relates to misunderstandings about legal principles or the consequences of actions.

Traditionally, most courts have ruled that mistake of law is not a valid defense to enforce a contract, since everyone is presumed to know the law. However, some jurisdictions recognize exceptions, especially when the mistake relates to contract interpretation or one party’s misapplication of legal rules.

Want to clarify when an agreement becomes binding? Review the Rules of Acceptance in Contract Law to understand how offers turn into enforceable contracts.

How Do These Mistakes Affect Contract Validity?

Mistakes in contract law impact whether an agreement is:

Void ab initio (treated as never existing)
Voidable (valid until rescinded by the mistaken party)
Valid but subject to remedies like rectification

Mutual and Common Mistakes Typically Render the Contract Void or Voidable

Mutual mistakes generally go to the heart of a contract’s terms—if parties never truly agreed on a key fact, the contract is considered voidable. Similarly, common mistakes, especially about non-existent subject matter, usually make the contract void from the start.

Unilateral Mistakes Are Less Likely to Void a Contract

Unilateral mistakes rarely void contracts unless the other party knew or caused the mistake. The mistaken party may seek rescission or damages if fraud or bad faith is involved.

Clerical Mistakes Are Usually Corrected

Courts often allow clerical errors to be corrected through rectification without invalidating the whole contract.

Mistake Examples in Different Industries

Understanding how these mistakes manifest across sectors can help tailor contract management and drafting practices.

Real Estate

Mutual mistake: Buyer and seller both believe zoning permits construction, but local laws prohibit it.
Common mistake: Both parties contract for land with a building, unaware it was destroyed.
Clerical mistake: Wrong property description in contract corrected by rectification.

Software / SaaS Agreements

Unilateral mistake: Vendor misquotes license fees due to a calculation error; buyer exploits pricing.
Mutual mistake: Both parties misunderstand service levels included; leads to disputes over delivery.
Mistake of law: Misinterpretation of data privacy obligations affecting contract scope.

Construction

Mutual mistake: Parties assume soil conditions suitable for foundation, but testing later shows otherwise.
Unilateral mistake: Contractor underestimates material costs due to calculation error; client unaware.
Clerical mistake: Misspelled project dates or milestones corrected without affecting contract validity.

Consumer and Employment Contracts

Common mistake: Both parties believe law allows certain benefits that are actually prohibited.
Unilateral mistake: Employee signs contract misunderstanding certain leave policies.
Clerical mistake: Typing error in salary figure corrected by contract amendment.

What Remedies Are Available When There’s a Mistake?

Depending on the type and severity of mistake, courts or parties themselves may apply several remedies:

Rescission: Canceling the contract and restoring parties to their prior positions.
Rectification: Correcting the contract’s wording to reflect the intended agreement.
Damages: Monetary compensation for losses caused by the mistake, especially if related to misrepresentation or bad faith.

Understanding these remedies helps parties respond effectively when mistakes surface during contract performance or negotiation.

How to Draft Contracts to Minimize Mistake Risks

Effective contract drafting reduces the chance of costly mistakes. Some practical tips include:

Clear Definitions and Terms: Precisely define key terms to avoid ambiguity.
Assumption Clauses: Specify facts and assumptions relied on by the parties.
Review and Verification Steps: Include protocols for checking critical information.
Mistake Handling Clauses: Outline procedures for addressing discovered mistakes, including correction or renegotiation mechanisms.
Integration and Entire Agreement Clauses: Close off reliance on outside assumptions or discussions.
Cross-industry Customization: Tailor clauses to the typical mistakes and risks in the respective sector.

For a deeper dive on drafting best practices, see our Contract Drafting Resource.

When to Seek Professional Advice

Mistakes in contracts can have complex legal consequences, especially under different jurisdictions, where rules on mistake and remedies vary. For instance, common law jurisdictions like the US and UK emphasize mutual and unilateral mistake doctrines, while civil law systems may focus more on contract reformation.

When you encounter ambiguous terms, potential errors, or disputes stemming from mistake, consulting legal professionals is essential to assess options such as rescission, rectification, or enforcing the contract.

Learn more about contract law principles and when contracts are considered invalid to strengthen your understanding.

Mitigating Contract Mistakes with AI-Driven CLM

Modern Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) platforms help organizations prevent costly contract mistakes by automating version control, clause validation, and review workflows. They flag inconsistencies, detect missing clauses, and maintain a single source of truth across teams. Sirion’s AI-native CLM takes this even further — using advanced language models to identify ambiguities, enforce template consistency, and track obligations throughout the contract lifecycle. By combining automation, intelligence, and post-signature visibility, Sirion enables businesses to move beyond error correction toward creating precise, compliant, and high-performing contracts that strengthen trust and reduce risk.

Mistake in Contract Law FAQs

What’s the difference between mistake and misrepresentation?

Mistake involves incorrect beliefs held by parties, while misrepresentation involves a false statement made by one party that induces another to enter a contract.

Can a unilateral mistake always void a contract?

No. Unilateral mistakes usually do not void contracts unless the other party knew or caused the mistake, or the mistake relates to fundamental terms.

Are clerical errors serious enough to void a contract?

Usually not. Clerical or typographical mistakes are often corrected by rectification without voiding the contract.

How do mistake rules differ across jurisdictions?

Common law tends to have stricter rules on mistake of law and focuses on mutual/unilateral distinctions, while civil law may allow broader reformation remedies. Cross-border contracts require careful attention to applicable law.

Can a mistake of law be used as a contract defense?

Typically, no. Courts generally hold parties responsible even if they misunderstood the law, though exceptions exist in some cases.

What remedies exist if a mistake is found in a contract?

Possible remedies include rescission (cancellation), rectification (correction), and damages (financial compensation).

How can I use contract drafting to manage mistake risks?

Use clear definitions, assumption clauses, mistake-handling provisions, and verification steps to reduce ambiguity and enable correction if mistakes occur.

Is it possible to have a mistake that doesn’t affect contract validity?

Yes. Minor or collateral mistakes that do not go to essential contract terms may not affect enforceability.

Additional Resources

Acceptance in Contract Law Header Banner

Contract Management