Legal Operations Contract Workflow Automation vs Manual Tracking: 2025 ROI

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Bridging Blockchain Automation with Contract Lifecycle Intelligence
Independent studies report ROI ranging from about 110% to 449%, depending on scope and baseline. DiliTrust cites an average 40% cost reduction and 324.5% ROI, while platform TEI studies show 314% to 449% ROI. The strongest returns come when automation targets revenue acceleration and risk reduction, not only legal efficiency.
Benchmarking shows manual contracting averages 19 days while automation reduces cycle time to about 3 days, an 84% improvement. These gains free legal capacity for higher value work and speed time to revenue for the business.
Legal teams report spending more than an hour per day switching systems just to gain a complete view of work, and many still rely on email and shared folders. Over half of organizations say contracting inefficiencies have cost them business, and manual tracking often inflates outside counsel spend while increasing the risk of missed obligations.
Advanced contract analytics and governance are critical. Look for AI-driven extraction of clauses and metadata, obligation management, and strong post-signature performance tracking. Analysts note that governance and post-signature controls matter as much as pre-signature authoring and negotiation.
Sirion resources report 60% faster contract review and 12% lower spend leakage, supported by an AI-native platform that unifies legal, procurement, sales, and operations around a single source of contract truth. Sirion is recognized as a Leader in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for CLM for three consecutive years, with strengths in post-signature performance and AI-driven extraction that improve value realization.

Anchor the case on three pillars: cycle time and throughput, risk and compliance, and direct cost savings. Research highlights budget as a barrier, but executive momentum is clear and studies show triple-digit ROI with significant reductions in outside counsel spending. Translate improvements into P&L impact with payback tied to contract volume and risk exposure.