Contract Management for Legal Teams – A Detailed Guide

Q: What kinds of contracts should we start managing in a CLM system?

Start with high-volume or high-risk contract types— NDAs , MSAs , vendor agreements , or sales contracts . These offer the most immediate ROI. From there, expand to less frequent but strategically important contracts like IP licenses or employment agreements. You don’t have to migrate everything at once.

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Let’s go back 30 years. If you asked anyone in the corporate world who handles contracting, without missing a beat, they’d say Legal. Jump back to today, and contracting is no longer siloed in that one team. Legal Operations has joined the party.

As these teams split up contracting responsibilities, it’s become more important that they have the tools and technology that allow both sides to do their jobs effectively and efficiently. Enter contract lifecycle management software.

But here’s the catch—not all CLM is the same. To truly reap the benefits of this tech, you need to invest in a solution that delivers the capabilities your teams actually need.

A Quick Legal vs Legal Ops Refresher

While they can have some overlapping tasks, Legal and Legal Operations make up two distinct roles within your in-house legal function.

Legal focuses on using their legal knowledge and expertise to tackle the legal aspects of contracting, reduce risk, and act as strategic partners for the business.

Your lawyers and paralegals want to speed up contracting cycles and keep contracting tasks in-house, lowering overall costs.

Legal Ops focuses on the business and process aspects of contract management, including technology, data, and cross-department coordination.

This team consists of people with finance, procurement, IT, and project management backgrounds. They aim to improve processes to empower attorneys, increase efficiencies, and boost cost savings.

Now, with different responsibilities comes the need for different capabilities.

Why is Effective Contract Management a Strategic Must-Have for Legal teams?

Gone are the days when Legal and Legal Ops were limited to post-signature contract review and firefighting. Today, proactive and strategic contract management is fundamental for protecting the business and enabling growth. It’s about transforming static documents into dynamic assets that drive value. Here’s why it’s so crucial for Legal and Legal Operations teams:

Mitigating Escalating Risk: Contracts are the bedrock of business relationships, but they also carry inherent risks – financial, operational, regulatory, and reputational. Ineffective management can lead to missed obligations, unfavorable terms going unnoticed, and costly disputes. For Legal and Legal Ops, weak contract oversight can trigger compliance breaches, litigation exposure, and unnecessary liabilities. Poor contract management is estimated to cause an average annual revenue loss of 9.2%. Robust processes help identify, assess, and mitigate these risks proactively.
Ensuring Robust Compliance: Navigating the complex web of local, national, and international regulations is a core legal function. Effective contract management ensures agreements comply with all relevant laws and standards, maintaining auditable records and reducing the likelihood of penalties or sanctions. Legal Ops can embed controls and checkpoints to ensure consistency across jurisdictions and business units. Keeping up with evolving regulations is consistently cited as a major challenge for legal departments.
Driving Legal Workflow Efficiency: Manual contract processes are notoriously slow and cumbersome, creating significant bottlenecks. Legal teams bogged down in low-value administrative tasks can’t focus on strategic work Legal Ops plays a critical role in automating contract lifecycle stages, standardizing templates, and eliminating redundancies—freeing up legal talent to focus on higher-impact activities. Manual workflows can delay contract execution by an average of 3-4 weeks.
Accelerating Deal Flow Without Compromising Diligence: Legal review is often perceived as a roadblock to closing deals. Efficient contract management, however, accelerates negotiation cycles and speeds up execution, allowing the business to capitalize on opportunities faster Legal Ops can help design review protocols and escalation paths that balance speed with risk management, shifting Legal from bottleneck to business enabler.

Unlocking Strategic Insights: Contracts contain a wealth of business intelligence. Effective management allows legal teams to analyze terms, obligations, risks, and performance data across the entire contract portfolio, providing valuable insights to inform strategic decision-making and negotiation tactics. Legal Ops can surface these insights through dashboards, metrics, and reporting that tie directly to business priorities.

Navigating the Contract Lifecycle: Legal and Legal Ops’ Critical Role

Understanding the typical contract lifecycle helps pinpoint where Legal and Legal Ops input is most vital and where bottlenecks often occur. While stages can vary, a common flow includes:

Request: Business initiates a need for a contract. Legal often owns or collaborates on intake design, while Legal Ops defines intake workflows, routing logic, and ensures accurate data capture. Together, they assess initial risk and prioritize requests.
Drafting: Creating the initial contract document. Legal ensures standard templates and approved clauses are used, tailoring language to the specific deal while protecting the organization’s interests. Legal Ops supports this with clause libraries, playbooks, and automated drafting tools to speed up turnaround.
Negotiation: Parties discuss and redline terms. Legal is central here, balancing risk mitigation with the need to close the deal, ensuring clarity, and managing version control. Legal Ops facilitates collaboration through contract platforms and ensures a clean audit trail of edits and comments.
Approval: Internal stakeholders review and approve the final terms. Legal confirms all necessary approvals are obtained according to defined workflows. Legal Ops ensures approval processes are automated, tracked, and aligned with authority matrices to reduce delays and errors.
Execution: Parties sign the contract (often electronically). Legal ensures proper execution formalities are met. Legal Ops integrates e-signature tools and manages execution tracking to prevent signature gaps or misrouting.
Obligation Management: Tracking key dates, deliverables, and commitments post-signature. Legal plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance and mitigating breach risks. Legal Ops maintains centralized contract repositories, sets up automated reminders, and monitors compliance tasks. This stage is critical, as failure here can erode up to 40% of a contract’s value.
Analysis & Reporting: Evaluating contract performance, risks, and trends. Legal uses this data for reporting, future negotiations, and strategic planning. Legal Ops enables these insights through dashboards, metadata tagging, and analytics tools that surface actionable information.
Renewal/Termination: Managing the end-of-lifecycle events based on performance and strategic goals. Legal ensures proper notice periods and close-out procedures are followed. Legal Ops supports renewal tracking and decision-making by surfacing contract history, obligations, and performance data.

Throughout this cycle, Legal and Legal Ops act as a coordinated force—guardians of compliance, risk managers, process optimizers, and strategic advisors to the business.

What are the Toughest Contract Management Hurdles for Legal Teams?

While all departments face contract challenges, Legal and Legal Ops teams grapple with unique pressures and complexities. Moving beyond generic issues, here are some top hurdles disrupting legal and legal ops departments:

Challenge 1: Crippling Lack of Visibility & Control: Contracts stored in disparate locations (shared drives, email, filing cabinets) make finding specific agreements or clauses a time-consuming nightmare. This lack of a centralized, searchable system limits Legal’s ability to perform due diligence, while Legal Ops struggles to standardize oversight and tracking.
Challenge 2: Draining Manual Processes & Inefficiency: Relying on manual methods for drafting, redlining, approvals, and tracking obligations consumes vast amounts of legal time. Legal teams face resource strain, and Legal Ops battles inefficiencies that undermine department scalability. This administrative burden detracts from high-value strategic work and contributes to burnout, especially with high contract volumes.

Challenge 3: Ensuring Airtight Compliance Amid Regulatory Complexity: Keeping contracts aligned with ever-changing industry regulations, data privacy laws (like GDPR or CCPA), and jurisdictional requirements is a constant battle. Legal teams must navigate legal nuance, while Legal Ops must build scalable compliance processes that are audit-ready. Manual checks are error-prone and difficult to scale.
Challenge 4: Proactively Mitigating Contractual Risk: Identifying potentially harmful clauses (like ambiguous indemnities or unfavorable liability caps) during review, assessing overall portfolio risk, and ensuring post-signature obligations are met requires significant diligence. Legal teams are accountable for spotting risk, and Legal Ops must ensure risk controls are operationalized.
Challenge 5: Maintaining Consistency & Standardization: Ensuring adherence to approved templates and standard clause language across numerous contracts negotiated by different individuals is difficult manually. Legal requires consistency for enforceability, and Legal Ops drives standardization through tools and governance. Inconsistencies introduce unnecessary risk and weaken negotiating strategies.
Challenge 6: Overcoming Collaboration Bottlenecks: Coordinating reviews and approvals across legal, business, finance, and procurement teams, as well as negotiating with external parties, often involves cumbersome email chains and version control issues. Legal gets stuck in loops, while Legal Ops works to streamline workflows and centralize collaboration.
Challenge 7: Balancing Resource Constraints with Volume/Complexity: Legal departments are often asked to do more with less. Managing an increasing volume and complexity of contracts for legal teams with limited headcount and budget necessitates finding efficiency gains. Legal needs capacity relief, and Legal Ops must deliver scalable systems to meet business demand.

Enter CLM Software: Legal and Legal Ops’ Strategic Advantage

How can Legal and Legal Ops overcome these significant hurdles? The answer lies in leveraging dedicated contract lifecycle management software. Modern AI-Native CLM for Legal Teams are designed specifically to address the pain points experienced throughout the contract lifecycle, providing legal teams with the tools they need to work more efficiently, mitigate risk effectively, and demonstrate strategic value.

A robust CLM solution directly tackles the challenges outlined above. Here’s a closer look at key features and how they empower Legal and Legal Ops teams:

Centralized, Searchable Repository: This eliminates the “where is that contract?” problem. Legal gains fast access to critical clauses, and Legal Ops enforces centralized governance. All agreements are stored in one secure, digital location with powerful search capabilities (including metadata and full-text search), providing instant visibility and control.

Workflow Automation: Automates routine tasks like contract requests, approvals, reminders for key dates, and obligation tracking. Legal Ops can design scalable workflows that reduce Legal’s administrative load and accelerate turnaround.
AI-Powered Review & Analysis: This is where AI-Native CLM Platforms like Sirion truly differentiate. AI can extract key clauses and metadata, analyze contracts against playbooks, flag risks, and suggest alternate language. Legal benefits from faster review, while Legal Ops operationalizes AI to scale legal expertise.
Clause Libraries & Template Management: Provides pre-approved language and templates to maintain consistency. Legal ensures risk-aligned language, and Legal Ops manages version control, usage data, and updates centrally.
Risk Scoring & Obligation Tracking: CLM platforms flag risky clauses, assign risk levels, and track contractual obligations. Legal can prioritize reviews based on risk, and Legal Ops ensures no commitments fall through the cracks.
Automated Compliance & Audit Trails: CLM features track data privacy and industry-specific clauses while logging every contract interaction. Legal has defensible records, and Legal Ops can support seamless audits.
Collaboration & Negotiation Tools: Internal and external stakeholders can collaborate directly in-platform with redlining, version control, and task tracking. Legal negotiates faster, and Legal Ops eliminates inefficiencies from outdated communication methods.
Reporting & Analytics: CLM provides dashboards and reporting on contract KPIs, risk profiles, and performance. Legal gains strategic insight, and Legal Ops delivers data that supports continuous improvement and executive reporting.
Integration Capabilities: CLM integrates with CRM, ERP, eSignature, and other core systems. Legal benefits from data connectivity, and Legal Ops ensures CLM is embedded into the larger legal tech ecosystem.

Also Read: Best Legal AI Tools for Legal Teams for 2025

Quantifying the Impact: Real CLM Benefits & ROI for Legal Teams

Implementing a CLM solution isn’t just about smoother processes; it delivers tangible, measurable benefits that resonate with legal department goals and overall business objectives. Statistics show the significant impact CLM can have:

Measurable Efficiency Gains: CLM platforms can reduce contract review times by up to 50% and slash administrative workload associated with contracts by as much as 82%. Legal gets time back for complex matters, and Legal Ops demonstrates ROI through efficiency gains.
Demonstrable Risk Reduction: By improving visibility, standardizing language, automating obligation tracking, and leveraging AI for risk identification, CLM significantly lowers the risk of non-compliance penalties, missed revenue opportunities, and costly disputes. Legal can confidently manage risk, and Legal Ops puts preventive controls in place.
Improved Compliance Posture: Automated tracking, audit trails, and standardized processes make it easier to demonstrate compliance with internal policies and external regulations. CLM users report significant savings (2-4% annually) through improved compliance.
Tangible Cost Savings: Efficiency gains translate directly into cost savings by reducing the hours spent on manual tasks. CLM can cut administrative costs related to contracts by 25-30%. Legal budgets stretch further, and Legal Ops delivers fiscal accountability.
Empowering Strategic Legal Work: CLM frees up time and surfaces insights, enabling legal teams to serve as true business partners. Legal shifts from reactive to strategic, and Legal Ops elevates its impact across the enterprise.

Fitting CLM into Your Legal Operations Ecosystem

For organizations investing in Legal Operations, CLM software isn’t just another tool; it’s a cornerstone technology. Effective integrating CLM into Legal Operations is key to maximizing its value.

A modern CLM platform should seamlessly integrate with other technologies commonly used by legal departments, such as:

Matter Management Systems: Linking contracts to specific legal matters provides a holistic view of related activities and risks.
eBilling Systems: Connecting contract terms (like rates or payment schedules) to billing systems ensures accuracy and compliance.
eDiscovery Tools: Easily identifying and collecting relevant contracts for litigation or investigations.
CRM and ERP Systems: Sharing contract data with sales, finance, and procurement ensures alignment across the business.

By integrating CLM, legal ops teams can gain end-to-end visibility, automate cross-functional workflows, and generate more comprehensive analytics to measure departmental performance and demonstrate value. A powerful AI-Native CLM Platform serves as the central nervous system for contract intelligence within the broader legal tech stack.

Selecting the Right CLM: What Should Legal Teams Prioritize?

Choosing a CLM solution requires careful consideration, especially from a legal perspective. While needs vary, key factors for legal teams include:

Legal-Specific Functionality: Does the platform offer robust features tailored to legal workflows? Look closely at the sophistication of AI for review and analysis, clause library management, obligation tracking, and compliance features.
Ease of Use & Adoption: A powerful system is useless if no one uses it. Prioritize intuitive interfaces and solutions that minimize disruption to existing workflows to ensure user adoption.
Integration Capabilities: Assess the platform’s ability to connect with your existing tech stack (CRM, ERP, Matter Management, etc.). Open APIs and pre-built connectors are crucial.
Security & Scalability: Ensure the vendor meets enterprise-grade security standards (SOC 2, ISO 27001) and can scale to handle your current and future contract volume and complexity.
Vendor Support & Expertise: Look for a vendor with deep expertise in contract management and a proven track record with legal departments in similar industries. Responsive support and a clear implementation plan are essential.

Gazing Ahead: The Future of Legal Contract Management

The evolution of contract management for legal teams is intrinsically linked to technological advancements. AI will continue to play an increasingly sophisticated role, moving beyond review assistance towards predictive analytics – forecasting potential risks, suggesting optimal negotiation strategies based on historical data, and even automating more complex drafting tasks. The focus will shift further towards leveraging contract data not just for risk mitigation but for proactive strategic planning, making the legal department an indispensable source of business intelligence.

Transform Your Legal Department with Smarter Contract Management

Effective contract management is no longer optional for legal teams; it’s fundamental to mitigating risk, ensuring compliance, driving efficiency, and enabling business growth. The manual processes and scattered documents of the past are inadequate for today’s complex commercial landscape. By embracing dedicated CLM technology, particularly AI-Native CLM platforms like Sirion, legal departments can automate tedious tasks, gain unprecedented visibility and control, make data-driven decisions, and ultimately transform their function into a strategic powerhouse for the organization. Investing in the right CLM solution is investing in the future resilience and success of your legal team and the entire business.

Next Read: Elevating CLM Legal Processes with Gen AI

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What kinds of contracts should we start managing in a CLM system?

Start with high-volume or high-risk contract types—NDAs, MSAs, vendor agreements, or sales contracts. These offer the most immediate ROI. From there, expand to less frequent but strategically important contracts like IP licenses or employment agreements. You don’t have to migrate everything at once.

Will adopting a CLM system replace legal team members or reduce headcount?

No. CLM isn’t about replacing people—it’s about enabling them to focus on higher-value work. By automating repetitive tasks like tracking obligations or redlining standard terms, CLM allows legal professionals to spend more time on complex negotiations, risk strategy, and advising the business.

How do we ensure data security and confidentiality in a CLM platform?

Most enterprise-grade CLM platforms comply with industry standards like SOC 2, ISO 27001, and GDPR. You should evaluate vendors based on encryption protocols, role-based access, audit logs, and their ability to integrate with your existing identity and security infrastructure.

What’s the biggest reason CLM implementations fail in legal departments?

Lack of user adoption. If the platform is too complex or doesn’t fit into existing workflows, teams will revert to email and Word docs. Involving legal and legal ops in the design process, starting small, and providing training are key to successful rollout.

We already have a contract repository—do we still need CLM?

A repository stores contracts, but it doesn’t manage them. CLM platforms automate contract creation, routing, negotiation, obligation tracking, and analytics. If you’re only storing PDFs, you’re missing out on visibility, compliance automation, and actionable insights that CLM provides.

Additional Resources

Contract AI